Valencia, October 28, 2020.- The Valencian Anti-Fraud Agency has published the final resolution on an investigation carried out by the Swedish City Council for the payment of unjustified invoices to several companies that provide services at the Sant Josep de Gent Major Residence.

The investigation began with a complaint filed with the AVAF in December 2018 against the mayor of Sueca for an “alleged crime of trespass” derived from the payment of bills to several companies that provide services in the residence of the elderly.

In total, 69 invoices would have been paid to the companies EULEN, S.A .; CLÍNICA GERIÁTRICA EL CASTILLO, S.A .; EL CASTILLO ATENCIÓN A LA DEPENDENCIA, S.A. Y NESEREM, S.L for an amount of 2,068,000 euros regardless of any contracting procedure.
The investigation began with a complaint filed with the AVAF in December 2018 against the mayor of Sueca for an “alleged crime of trespass” derived from the payment of bills to several companies that provide services in the residence of the elderly.

In total, 69 invoices would have been paid to the companies EULEN, S.A .; CLÍNICA GERIÁTRICA EL CASTILLO, S.A .; EL CASTILLO ATENCIÓN A LA DEPENDENCIA, S.A. Y NESEREM, S.L for an amount of 2,068,000 euros regardless of any contracting procedure.

All these invoices received the unfavorable report of the municipal intervention up to 26 occasions where the illegality of the facts was warned. The approval of the invoices was made by resolution of the mayor’s office or the local government board, resolving the discrepancy of the intervention and approving the list of invoices through the extrajudicial recognition of credit.

Likewise, during the investigation, the possible existence of 287 invoices that would have been settled following the same procedure was detected.

The Valencian Anti-Fraud Agency in its report urges the San José de Sueca Autonomous Agency for the Residence of the Elderly and the Sueca City Council to ex officio review of the acts incurred due to nullity of full right since this action could be contrary to the law. having caused a result contrary to the public interest by not being protected by law.

	Editable note in ODT format
	Editable note in DOC format
	Resolution of conclusions. Sueca Town Hall